Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: move locking operations to their own struct

From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Thu Aug 25 2016 - 12:34:05 EST

Next message: kbuild test robot: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] smc91x: always use 8-bit access if necessary"
Previous message: Wolfram Sang: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: add i2c_trylock_bus wrapper, use it"
In reply to: Peter Rosin: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: move locking operations to their own struct"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:17:57AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> This makes it trivial to constify them, so do that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to for-next, thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Next message: kbuild test robot: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] smc91x: always use 8-bit access if necessary"
Previous message: Wolfram Sang: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: add i2c_trylock_bus wrapper, use it"
In reply to: Peter Rosin: "Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: move locking operations to their own struct"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]