Re: [PATCH 0/4] Clarify/standardize memory barriers for lock/unlock

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Aug 29 2016 - 06:54:08 EST

Next message: Baoyou Xie: "[PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr: mark symbols static where possible"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 4/4] qspinlock for x86: smp_mb__after_spin_lock() is free"
In reply to: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [PATCH 1/4] spinlock: Document memory barrier rules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Please use --no-chain-reply-to.

Next message: Baoyou Xie: "[PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr: mark symbols static where possible"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 4/4] qspinlock for x86: smp_mb__after_spin_lock() is free"
In reply to: Manfred Spraul: "Re: [PATCH 1/4] spinlock: Document memory barrier rules"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]