Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: move locking operations to their own struct

From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Tue Aug 30 2016 - 16:56:56 EST

Next message: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/syscalls: allow multiple syscall numbers per syscall"
Previous message: Alexei Starovoitov: "Re: [RFC v2 09/10] landlock: Handle cgroups (performance)"
In reply to: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: move locking operations to their own struct"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:07:01PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> This makes it trivial to constify them, so do that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to for-next, thanks! Thanks for the quick ack, Daniel!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Next message: Steven Rostedt: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracing/syscalls: allow multiple syscall numbers per syscall"
Previous message: Alexei Starovoitov: "Re: [RFC v2 09/10] landlock: Handle cgroups (performance)"
In reply to: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: move locking operations to their own struct"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]