Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] pinctrl: Add IRQ support to STM32 gpios
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Fri Sep 02 2016 - 15:16:43 EST
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> +static int stm32_gpio_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
> + unsigned long *hwirq,
> + unsigned int *type)
> +{
> + if ((fwspec->param_count != 2) ||
> + (fwspec->param[0] >= STM32_GPIO_IRQ_LINE))
> + return -EINVAL;
Just a nitpick. This is unnecessarily hard to parse because you indented
the line break like a conditional statement
> + if ((fwspec->param_count != 2) ||
> + (fwspec->param[0] >= STM32_GPIO_IRQ_LINE))
> + return -EINVAL;
Makes it immediately obvious that the second line belongs to the if.
> +static void stm32_gpio_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct irq_data *irq_data)
> +{
> + struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank = d->host_data;
> + struct stm32_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(bank->gpio_chip.parent);
> +
> + if (gpiochip_lock_as_irq(&bank->gpio_chip, irq_data->hwirq)) {
> + dev_err(pctl->dev,
> + "Unable to configure STM32 %s%ld as IRQ\n",
> + bank->gpio_chip.label, irq_data->hwirq);
> + return;
Hmm, that's nasty. When an interrupt is mapped then we don't expect the
activate function to fail. You really should lock that interrupt when it's
mapped.
> + }
> + regmap_field_write(pctl->irqmux[irq_data->hwirq], bank->range.id);
> +}
> +static int stm32_gpio_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + unsigned int virq,
> + unsigned int nr_irqs, void *data)
> +{
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data;
> + struct irq_fwspec parent_fwspec;
> + struct stm32_pinctrl *pctl = domain->host_data;
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++)
> + irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
> + &stm32_gpio_irq_chip, pctl);
> +
> + parent_fwspec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
> + parent_fwspec.param_count = 2;
> + parent_fwspec.param[0] = fwspec->param[0];
> + parent_fwspec.param[1] = fwspec->param[1];
> +
> + return irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs,
> + &parent_fwspec);
So doing it here would be probably the right thing to do:
ret = gpiochip_lock_as_irq();
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs,
&parent_fwspec);
if (ret)
gpiochip_unlock_as_irq();
return ret;
So of course you need your own free() function which undoes that lock
thingy.
Thanks,
tglx