Re: [PATCH] sysfs: correctly handle read offset on PREALLOC attrs

From: Konstantin Khlebnikov
Date: Mon Sep 05 2016 - 10:02:51 EST


On 05.09.2016 16:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 04:25:48PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
Bump

Huh?

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
<khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Attributes declared with __ATTR_PREALLOC use sysfs_kf_read() which returns
zero bytes for non-zero offset. This breaks script checkarray in mdadm tool
in debian where /bin/sh is 'dash' because its builtin 'read' reads only one
byte at a time. Script gets 'i' instead of 'idle' when reads current action
from /sys/block/$dev/md/sync_action and as a result does nothing.

This patch adds trivial implementation of partial read: generate whole
string and move required part into buffer head.

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 4ef67a8c95f3 ("sysfs/kernfs: make read requests on pre-alloc files use the buffer.")
Link: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787950
Cc: Stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v3.19+
---
fs/sysfs/file.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c
index f35523d4fa3a..b803213d1307 100644
--- a/fs/sysfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c
@@ -114,9 +114,15 @@ static ssize_t sysfs_kf_read(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *buf,
* If buf != of->prealloc_buf, we don't know how
* large it is, so cannot safely pass it to ->show
*/
- if (pos || WARN_ON_ONCE(buf != of->prealloc_buf))
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(buf != of->prealloc_buf))
return 0;
len = ops->show(kobj, of->kn->priv, buf);
+ if (pos) {
+ if (len <= pos)
+ return 0;
+ len -= pos;
+ memmove(buf, buf + pos, len);
+ }
return min(count, len);
}

I don't have this in any queue of mine, so I don't understand what you
are asking about.

totally confused,


Well.. One user poked me about this bug.

Patch was
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

get_maintainer.pl points to you but probably this more VFS problem. so... this time I've added Al into CC
Should I resend patch once again, or this very trivial but pretty dangerous problem could be solved without this?

IIRR this breaks automatic recheck of MD RAIDs for all debian-based systems

--
Konstantin