Re: [PATCH 1/5] irqtime: No need for preempt-safe accessors

[Rik van Riel]

On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 16:03 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> We can safely use the preempt-unsafe accessors for irqtime when we
> flush its counters to kcpustat as IRQs are disabled at this time.
> 
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 

All Rights Reversed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part