Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] Documentation: Add support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol

[Nishanth Menon]

On 09/05/2016 02:09 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 02/09/16 23:27, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> > On 09/02/2016 12:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > Rob,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:06:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > +
> > > > > +TI-SCI Client Device Node:
> > > > > +========================
> > > > > +
> > > > > +Client nodes refer to the required TI-SCI device using the "ti,sci"
> > > > > property.
> > > >
> > > > As I mentioned for power domains, for clients that are self contained
> > > > (i.e. a single function) I think the should be child nodes.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback. I think we should be able to do that and also
> > > assume you have no further improvements you'd like to see here.
> > >
> > > Looking at current Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt
> > > -> it makes sense to stick along the same lines as you mentioned.
> > >
> > > Dave, Tero: do you guys have any objections?
> >
> > No objections, I think this is a logical move.
>
> Yea, sounds like a valid change. I believe you are going to post a new
> version so I can modify the clock driver also accordingly?

Just closing the loop here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/6/747 posted. 
the changes are in binding - clk driver itself should'nt by itself 
have any changes.


--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon