[PATCH] drm/rockchip: mark symbols static where possible

From: Baoyou Xie
Date: Wed Sep 07 2016 - 07:01:51 EST


We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c:309:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'rockchip_drm_fb_suspend' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c:318:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'rockchip_drm_fb_resume' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

In fact, these functions are only used in the file in which they are
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
So this patch marks these functions with 'static'.

Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
index a822d49..3723683 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static struct drm_driver rockchip_drm_driver = {
};

#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-void rockchip_drm_fb_suspend(struct drm_device *drm)
+static void rockchip_drm_fb_suspend(struct drm_device *drm)
{
struct rockchip_drm_private *priv = drm->dev_private;

@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ void rockchip_drm_fb_suspend(struct drm_device *drm)
console_unlock();
}

-void rockchip_drm_fb_resume(struct drm_device *drm)
+static void rockchip_drm_fb_resume(struct drm_device *drm)
{
struct rockchip_drm_private *priv = drm->dev_private;

--
2.7.4