Re: [PATCH 3/4] mfd: ucb1x00: remove NO_IRQ check

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 06 Sep 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> probe_irq_off() returns '0' on failure, not NO_IRQ, so the check
> in this driver is clearly wrong. This replaces it with the
> regular '!irq' check used in other drivers.
> 
> The sa1100 platform that this driver is used on originally numbered
> all its interrupts starting at '0', which would have conflicted with
> this change, but as of commit 18f3aec ("ARM: 8230/1: sa1100: shift
> IRQs by one"), this is not a problem any more.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Applied, thanks.

I'm going to leave this in MFD 'as is' at them moment.  This will
break bisectability of course, but it's better we get this in -next
now in order to match it up with the other half of the fix.

The plan is probably to squash the two patches together, keeping
Russell's authorship (first come, first served) and give creds to Arnd
for this part of the patch.

Unless anyone has any complaints, I also plan to keep both of your
SoBs.

> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-core.c b/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-core.c
> index 48bea5038654..d6fb2e1a759a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-core.c
> @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static int ucb1x00_probe(struct mcp *mcp)
>  	ucb1x00_enable(ucb);
>  	ucb->irq = ucb1x00_detect_irq(ucb);
>  	ucb1x00_disable(ucb);
> -	if (ucb->irq == NO_IRQ) {
> +	if (!ucb->irq) {
>  		dev_err(&ucb->dev, "IRQ probe failed\n");
>  		ret = -ENODEV;
>  		goto err_no_irq;

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog