Re: [PATCH v2 18/19] remoteproc: core: Add function to create remoteproc local resource table
From: Lee Jones
Date: Thu Sep 08 2016 - 06:18:24 EST
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Loic Pallardy wrote:
> Rproc driver has now the capability to add resources dynamically
> thanks to rproc_request_resource API.
> Depending on associated action, resource request could impact
> firmware resource table or define new local resource.
>
> In order to preserve current remoteproc resource handling
> mechanism, all local resources are gathered in a local resource
> table which won't be shared with firmware and proceed by
> remoteproc core as firmware one.
>
> It is rproc driver responsibility to provide the right resource
> information using rproc_request_resource API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index cbfbdf8..73b460a 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1270,6 +1270,65 @@ static int rproc_apply_resource_overrides(struct rproc *rproc,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static struct resource_table*
> +rproc_local_resource_create(struct rproc *rproc, int *tablesz)
Oh, you're happy to use "resource" (instead of rsc) in function names
that *you* introduce! ;)
> +{
> + struct fw_rsc_hdr *hdr;
> + struct fw_rsc_spare *spare_rsc;
> + struct rproc_request_resource *resource;
> + struct resource_table *table = NULL;
> + int size = 0, ret;
> +
> + /* compute total request size */
Grammar.
> + list_for_each_entry(resource, &rproc->override_resources, node) {
> + if (resource->action == RSC_ACT_LOCAL)
> + size += resource->size + sizeof(hdr) + 4; /* entry offset */
> + }
The {} are superfluous.
Still non sure if that comment helps at all.
> + /* any extra resource ? */
/* If there isn't any resource remaining, don't ... XXX */
> + if (!size)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* add table header and spare resource */
> + size += sizeof(*table);
> + size += sizeof(*hdr) + sizeof(*spare_rsc) + 4;
> +
> + /* create new rsc tbl with only a spare resource */
I would be as forthcoming as possible in comments. Use
full/descriptive names for things.
> + table = devm_kzalloc(&rproc->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!table) {
> + table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + goto out;
> + }
'\n'
> + table->ver = 1;
> + table->num = 1;
> + table->offset[0] = sizeof(*table) + 4;
> +
> + hdr = (void *)table + table->offset[0];
> + hdr->type = RSC_SPARE;
> +
> + spare_rsc = (void *)hdr + sizeof(*hdr);
> + spare_rsc->len = size - table->offset[0] - sizeof(*hdr) - sizeof(*spare_rsc);
> +
> + /* add new resource one by one */
"resources"
> + list_for_each_entry(resource, &rproc->override_resources, node) {
> + if (resource->action == RSC_ACT_LOCAL) {
> + /* Create a new enty */
This comment doesn't add any more information than the function name.
> + ret = __add_rsc_tbl_entry(rproc, resource,
> + table, size);
> + if (ret) {
> + table = ERR_PTR(ret);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + *tablesz = size;
> + rproc_dump_resource_table(rproc, table, *tablesz);
This is going to add up to a lot of dumps of the resource table?
> +out:
> + return table;
> +}
> +
> +
Superfluous '\n'.
> /*
> * take a firmware and boot a remote processor with it.
> */
> @@ -1278,7 +1337,7 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> const char *name = rproc->firmware;
> struct resource_table *table, *loaded_table;
> - int ret, tablesz;
> + int ret, tablesz, local_tablesz;
>
> ret = rproc_fw_sanity_check(rproc, fw);
> if (ret)
> @@ -1335,6 +1394,11 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> goto clean_up;
> }
>
> + rproc->local_table = rproc_local_resource_create(rproc, &local_tablesz);
> + if (IS_ERR(rproc->local_table)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to create local resource table\n");
> + goto clean_up;
> + }
> }
>
> /* reset max_notifyid */
> @@ -1348,6 +1412,13 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> goto clean_up;
> }
>
> + ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, rproc->local_table,
> + local_tablesz, rproc_vdev_handler);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to handle vdev resources: %d\n", ret);
> + goto clean_up;
> + }
> +
> /* handle fw resources which are required to boot rproc */
> ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, rproc->cached_table, tablesz,
> rproc_loading_handlers);
> @@ -1356,6 +1427,13 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> goto clean_up;
> }
>
> + ret = rproc_handle_resources(rproc, rproc->local_table,
> + local_tablesz, rproc_loading_handlers);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to handle vdev resources: %d\n", ret);
> + goto clean_up;
> + }
> +
> /* load the ELF segments to memory */
> ret = rproc_load_segments(rproc, fw);
> if (ret) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 2b0f1d7..653e6f3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -495,6 +495,7 @@ struct rproc {
> int max_notifyid;
> struct resource_table *table_ptr;
> struct resource_table *cached_table;
> + struct resource_table *local_table;
> bool has_iommu;
> bool auto_boot;
> };
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog