Re: [PATCH v2 08/19] remoteproc: core: Associate action to resource request

[Lee Jones]

On Thu, 08 Sep 2016, loic pallardy wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 09:23 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Loic Pallardy wrote:
> > 
> > > With new rproc_request_resource API, rproc driver has now the
> > > capability to provide resources to remoteproc in order to modify
> > > firmware resource table.
> > > But in some cases, other operations are needed like compatibility
> > > check between resources defined at firmware level and those handled
> > > by rproc driver, or remoteproc local resource management when firmware
> > > has no resource table.
> > > 
> > > This patch associates action to each resource request to:
> > > - verify a resource
> > > - update/amend a resource in firmware resource table
> > > - handle locally a resource
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@xxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > >  include/linux/remoteproc.h           | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > index 3282a4e..cd64fae 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > @@ -876,16 +876,20 @@ static void rproc_dump_resource_table(struct rproc *rproc,

[...]

> > >  /**
> > > + * enum rproc_request_action - types of actions associated to a resource
> > > + * request
> > > + *
> > > + * @RSC_ACT_CHECK:	  request to verify this resource with firmware one
> > > + * @RSC_ACT_UPDATE:	  request to update firmware resource table with associated
> > > + *			  resource if possible
> > > + * @RSC_ACT_FORCE_UPDATE: force firmware resource table update with associated
> > > + *		          resource
> > > + * @RSC_ACT_LOCAL:        request to handle this resource localy but not to update
> > > + *			  firmware resource table
> > > + * @RSC_ACT_LAST:         just keep this one at the end
> > > + */
> > > +enum rproc_request_action {
> > > +	RSC_ACT_VERIFY		= 0,
> > > +	RSC_ACT_UPDATE		= 1,
> > > +	RSC_ACT_FORCE_UPDATE	= 2,
> > > +	RSC_ACT_LOCAL		= 3,
> > 
> > For reviewing purposes I suggest adding these entries as you start to
> > support them.  Then we have the code and the suggested comment in one
> > patch for easy comparison.
> RSC_ACT_LAST need in this patch, that's why action enum defined here.

Okay, good point.

> > > +	RSC_ACT_LAST		= 4,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > >   * struct rproc_requested_resources - add a resource to the resource table
> > >   *
> > >   * @resource:	pointer to a 'struct fw_rsc_*' resource
> > >   * @type:	'fw_resource_type' resource type
> > >   * @size:	size of resource
> > > + * @action:	action associated the resource
> > >   * @node:	list node
> > >   *
> > >   * Resources can be added by platform-specific rproc drivers calling
> > > @@ -350,6 +373,7 @@ struct rproc_request_resource {
> > >  	void *resource;
> > >  	u32 type;
> > >  	u32 size;
> > > +	u32 action;
> > >  	struct list_head node;
> > >  };
> > > 
> > > @@ -517,7 +541,7 @@ struct rproc_vdev {
> > >  	u32 rsc_offset;
> > >  };
> > > 
> > > -int rproc_request_resource(struct rproc *rproc, u32 type, void *res);
> > > +int rproc_request_resource(struct rproc *rproc, u32 type, u32 action, void *res);
> > >  struct rproc *rproc_get_by_phandle(phandle phandle);
> > >  struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> > >  			  const struct rproc_ops *ops,
> > 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog