Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable

[Richard Cochran]

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:19:24PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> Also given many other syscalls take clockids and the backing logic
> isn't really getting removed (probably could cut the dynamic posix
> clocks core with the same conditional), I wonder if you could get a
> similar size win by taking a slightly more narrow cutting of the
> subsystem. That way you could preserve the more useful clock_gettime()
> functionality, but maybe stub out some of the less often used
> functionality.

I want to support tinification, but I also doubt the utility of
removing clock_gettime() and clock_nanosleep().  I can't imagine ever
building a user space without those.  In fact, thinking about IoT,
having good time is critical, and so these are the *last* functions I
would remove when downsizing.

Thanks,
Richard