Re: [PATCH V5] leds: trigger: Introduce a USB port trigger
From: RafaÅ MiÅecki
Date: Fri Sep 09 2016 - 07:31:19 EST
On 9 September 2016 at 13:05, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 05:34:40PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 06:08:24PM +0200, RafaÅ MiÅecki wrote:
>> > From: RafaÅ MiÅecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > This commit adds a new trigger responsible for turning on LED when USB
>> > device gets connected to the selected USB port. This can can useful for
>> > various home routers that have USB port(s) and a proper LED telling user
>> > a device is connected.
>> >
>> > The trigger gets its documentation file but basically it just requires
>> > enabling it and selecting USB ports (e.g. echo 1 > ports/usb1-1).
>> >
>> > There was a long discussion on design of this driver. Its current state
>> > is a result of picking them most adjustable solution as others couldn't
>> > handle all cases.
>> >
>> > 1) It wasn't possible for the driver to register separated trigger for
>> > each USB port. Some physical USB ports are handled by more than one
>> > controller and so by more than one USB port. E.g. USB 2.0 physical
>> > port may be handled by OHCI's port and EHCI's port.
>> > It's also not possible to assign more than 1 trigger to a single LED
>> > and implementing such feature would be tricky due to syncing triggers
>> > and sysfs conflicts with old triggers.
>> >
>> > 2) Another idea was to register trigger per USB hub. This wouldn't allow
>> > handling devices with multiple USB LEDs and controllers (hubs)
>> > controlling more than 1 physical port. It's common for hubs to have
>> > few ports and each may have its own LED.
>> >
>> > This final trigger is highly flexible. It allows selecting any USB ports
>> > for any LED. It was also modified (compared to the initial version) to
>> > allow choosing ports rather than having user /guess/ proper names. It
>> > was successfully tested on SmartRG SR400ac which has 3 USB LEDs,
>> > 2 physical ports and 3 controllers.
>> >
>> > Another planned feature is support for LED reacting to the USB activity.
>> > This can be implemented with another sysfs file for setting mode. The
>> > default mode wouldn't change so there won't be ABI breakage and such
>> > feature can be safely implemented later.
>> >
>>
>> It has such driver at: drivers/usb/common/led.c
>
> Ugh, I thought I had seen something like this before...
>
> RafaÅ, can you just use this in-kernel code instead?
I really don't think I can because of all the reasons I carefully
listed in the commit message.
Have you took a look at that simple driver? It does nothing I need.
Its design doesn't allow implementing features I clearly listed in the
commit message.
--
RafaÅ