Am Samstag, 10. September 2016, 17:37:41 CEST schrieb Andy Yan:
Hi Heiko:I think I would prefer that ... to not confuse socs with boards :-)
On 2016å09æ10æ 17:15, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
Hi Andy,We call them px3 or px5 development board in the internal development.
Am Samstag, 10. September 2016, 17:01:34 CEST schrieb Andy Yan:
PX3 board is designed by Rockchip for automotive field,Just like to confirm the naming.
which intergrated with CVBS(TP2825)/MIPI DSI/LVDS/HDMI
video input/output interface, WIFI/BT/GPS(on a module
named S500 which based on MT6620), Gsensor BMA250E and
light&proximity sensor STK3410.
Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt | 4 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188-px3.dts | 337
+++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 342 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3188-px3.dts
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt index
6668645..e680105
100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.txt
@@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ Rockchip platforms device tree bindings
Required root node properties:
- compatible = "radxa,rock", "rockchip,rk3188";
+- Rockchip PX3 board:
+ Required root node properties:
+ - compatible = "rockchip,px3", "rockchip,rk3188";
I read the announcement of both the PX3 and PX5 socs, are the boards
really
also named only px3 + px5 - same as the socs they carry, or are they more
likely to be called px3-evb or similar?
The dts themself look fine on first glance.
Of course I can change them to px3/px5-evb if you desire.
All the other Rockchip devboards are always called evb, so I guess it would be
the same for the px3+px5 ones.
so I guess the compatible would be
- compatible = "rockchip,px3-evb", "rockchip,px3", "rockchip,rk3188";
Heiko