Re: [PATCH 0/5] ATM-nicstar: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

From: David Miller
Date: Sun Sep 11 2016 - 00:46:42 EST

Next message: David Miller: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] ATM-ZeitNet: Fine-tuning for three function implementations"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] rapidio: avoid GFP_KERNEL in atomic context in riocm_send_close()"
In reply to: SF Markus Elfring: "[PATCH 5/5] ATM-nicstar: Refactor a dev_alloc_skb() call in dequeue_rx()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:15:37 +0200

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 09:10:01 +0200
>
> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.

Series applied.

Next message: David Miller: "Re: [PATCH 0/4] ATM-ZeitNet: Fine-tuning for three function implementations"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] rapidio: avoid GFP_KERNEL in atomic context in riocm_send_close()"
In reply to: SF Markus Elfring: "[PATCH 5/5] ATM-nicstar: Refactor a dev_alloc_skb() call in dequeue_rx()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]