Re: [PATCHv12 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Sun Sep 11 2016 - 13:24:59 EST


On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:14:09AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > We stil always have the common structure first. And at least for
> > > cgroups supports that's what matters.
> > >
> > > Re the actual structures - we'll really need to make sure we
> > >
> > > a) expose proper userspace abi headers in the kernel for all code
> > > in the RDMA subsystem
> > > b) actually use that in the userspace components
> > >
> > > I've posted some initial work toward a) a while ago, and once we
>
> Did it get merged? Do you have a pointer?

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg31958.html

> this without it would be very hard, as everything is cross-linked, I
> couldnn't unwind libibcm until I fixed a bit of verbs, and rdmacm can't
> even include its uapi header until the duplicate definitions in the
> verbs copy are delt with .. and I've also learned we are making
> changing to the kernel uapi header and since nothing uses them we never even
> compile test :( :( eg
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b493d91d333e867a043f7ff1397bcba6e2d0dda2]

> However, everything under verbs is not straightforward. The files in
> userspace are not copies...
>
> user:
>
> struct ibv_query_device {
> __u32 command;
> __u16 in_words;
> __u16 out_words;
> __u64 response;
> __u64 driver_data[0];
> };
>
> kernel:
>
> struct ib_uverbs_query_device {
> __u64 response;
> __u64 driver_data[0];
> };

We'll obviously need different strutures for the libibvers API
and the kernel interface in this case, and we'll need to figure out
how to properly translate them. I think a cast, plus compile time
type checking ala BUILD_BUG_ON is the way to go.

> eg the userspace version stuffs the header into the struct and the
> kernel version does not. Presumably this is for efficiency so that no
> copies are required when marshaling. This impacts everything :(
>
> I'm thinking the best way forward might be to use a script and
> transform userspace into:
>
> struct ibv_query_device {
> struct ib_uverbs_cmd_hdr hdr;
> struct ib_uverbs_query_device cmd;
> };

That would break the users of the interface. However automatically
generating the user ABI from the kernel one might still be a good idea
in the long run.