[PATCH 1/5] ipc/sem: do not call wake_sem_queue_do() prematurely

[Davidlohr Bueso]

... as this call should obviously be paired with its _prepare()
counterpart. At least whenever possible, as there is no harm in
calling it bogusly as we do now in a few places. Immediate error
semop(2) paths that are far from ever having the task block can
be simplified and avoid a few unnecessary loads on their way out
of the call as it is not deeply nested.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@xxxxxxx>
---
 ipc/sem.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 5e318c5f749d..a4e8bb2fae38 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1887,16 +1887,22 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops,
 	}
 
 	error = -EFBIG;
-	if (max >= sma->sem_nsems)
-		goto out_rcu_wakeup;
+	if (max >= sma->sem_nsems) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		goto out_free;
+	}
 
 	error = -EACCES;
-	if (ipcperms(ns, &sma->sem_perm, alter ? S_IWUGO : S_IRUGO))
-		goto out_rcu_wakeup;
+	if (ipcperms(ns, &sma->sem_perm, alter ? S_IWUGO : S_IRUGO)) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		goto out_free;
+	}
 
 	error = security_sem_semop(sma, sops, nsops, alter);
-	if (error)
-		goto out_rcu_wakeup;
+	if (error) {
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+		goto out_free;
+	}
 
 	error = -EIDRM;
 	locknum = sem_lock(sma, sops, nsops);
@@ -2039,7 +2045,6 @@ sleep_again:
 
 out_unlock_free:
 	sem_unlock(sma, locknum);
-out_rcu_wakeup:
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 	wake_up_sem_queue_do(&tasks);
 out_free:
-- 
2.6.6