[PATCH 40/47] block-rbd: One function call less in rbd_dev_probe_parent() after error detection

From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Mon Sep 12 2016 - 15:34:30 EST


From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 20:00:08 +0200

The rbd_dev_destroy() function was called in two cases by the
rbd_dev_probe_parent() function during error handling even if
the passed variable contained a null pointer.

* Adjust jump targets according to the current Linux coding
style convention.

* Delete an initialisation for the variable "parent" at the beginning
which became unnecessary with this refactoring.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/block/rbd.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index e01df3c..a037a5d 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -5950,7 +5950,7 @@ out_err:
*/
static int rbd_dev_probe_parent(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, int depth)
{
- struct rbd_device *parent = NULL;
+ struct rbd_device *parent;
int ret;

if (!rbd_dev->parent_spec)
@@ -5959,13 +5959,13 @@ static int rbd_dev_probe_parent(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, int depth)
if (++depth > RBD_MAX_PARENT_CHAIN_LEN) {
pr_info("parent chain is too long (%d)\n", depth);
ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out_err;
+ goto unparent_device;
}

parent = __rbd_dev_create(rbd_dev->rbd_client, rbd_dev->parent_spec);
if (!parent) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto out_err;
+ goto unparent_device;
}

/*
@@ -5977,15 +5977,15 @@ static int rbd_dev_probe_parent(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, int depth)

ret = rbd_dev_image_probe(parent, depth);
if (ret < 0)
- goto out_err;
+ goto destroy_device;

rbd_dev->parent = parent;
atomic_set(&rbd_dev->parent_ref, 1);
return 0;
-
-out_err:
- rbd_dev_unparent(rbd_dev);
+ destroy_device:
rbd_dev_destroy(parent);
+ unparent_device:
+ rbd_dev_unparent(rbd_dev);
return ret;
}

--
2.10.0