RE: [PATCH 2/2] pci-hyperv: properly handle device eject

From: Dexuan Cui
Date: Tue Sep 13 2016 - 06:24:10 EST


> From: devel [mailto:driverdev-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Long Li
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 7:54
> ...
> A PCI_EJECT message can arrive at the same time we are calling
> pci_scan_child_bus in the workqueue for the previous PCI_BUS_RELATIONS
> message, in this case we could potentailly modify the bus from two places.
> Properly lock the bus access.
>
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ static void hv_eject_device_work(struct work_struct
> *work)
> pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(hpdev->hbus->sysdata.domain, 0,
> wslot);
> if (pdev) {
> - pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(pdev);
> + pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device_locked(pdev);
> pci_dev_put(pdev);
> }

The _locked version tries to get the mutex pci_rescan_remove_lock.

But it looks pci_scan_child_bus() doesn't try to get the mutex(?), so how can
this patch make sure the 2 code paths are not running simultaneously?

Thanks,
-- Dexuan