Hello Tariq,We agree on this part, that's why here we should goto the _excluded_ label.
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Tariq Toukan wrote:
On 14/09/2016 2:09 PM, Sebastian Ott wrote:In this case a call to mlx4_create_eq failed. Do you really have to call
If an error occurs in mlx4_init_eq_table the index used in theYou are right, but your change below does not cover all cases.
err_out_unmap label is one too big which results in a panic in
mlx4_free_eq. This patch fixes the index in the error path.
The full solution looks like this:
@@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ int mlx4_init_eq_table(struct mlx4_dev *dev)
eq);
}
if (err)
- goto err_out_unmap;
+ goto err_out_unmap_excluded;
mlx4_free_eq for this index again?
As far as I understood this codeRegards,
mlx4_create_eq cleans up when it fails and thus there is no need for an
additional mlx4_free_eq call.
Regards,
Sebastian