Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] tmp/tpm_crb: fix Intel PTT hw bug during idle state

From: Jarkko Sakkinen
Date: Thu Sep 15 2016 - 02:23:46 EST


On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:04:19PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> There is a HW bug in Skylake, and Broxton PCH Intel PTT device, where
> most of the registers in the control area except START, REQUEST, CANCEL,
> and LOC_CTRL lost retention when the device is in the idle state. Hence
> we need to bring the device to ready state before accessing the other
> registers. The fix brings device to ready state before trying to read
> command and response buffer addresses in order to remap the for access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@xxxxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

/Jarkko

> ---
> V2: cmd read need to be called also before crb_init as this will run
> self test.
> V3: resend.
>
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> index b6923a8b3ff7..e945177cf2c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> struct list_head resources;
> struct resource io_res;
> struct device *dev = &device->dev;
> + u32 pa_high, pa_low;
> u64 cmd_pa;
> u32 cmd_size;
> u64 rsp_pa;
> @@ -345,12 +346,27 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> if (IS_ERR(priv->cca))
> return PTR_ERR(priv->cca);
>
> - cmd_pa = ((u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_high) << 32) |
> - (u64) ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_low);
> + /*
> + * PTT HW bug w/a: wake up the device to access
> + * possibly not retained registers.
> + */
> + ret = crb_cmd_ready(dev, priv);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + pa_high = ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_high);
> + pa_low = ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_pa_low);
> + cmd_pa = ((u64)pa_high << 32) | pa_low;
> cmd_size = ioread32(&priv->cca->cmd_size);
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "cmd_hi = %X cmd_low = %X cmd_size %X\n",
> + pa_high, pa_low, cmd_size);
> +
> priv->cmd = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, cmd_pa, cmd_size);
> - if (IS_ERR(priv->cmd))
> - return PTR_ERR(priv->cmd);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->cmd)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->cmd);
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> memcpy_fromio(&rsp_pa, &priv->cca->rsp_pa, 8);
> rsp_pa = le64_to_cpu(rsp_pa);
> @@ -358,7 +374,8 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
>
> if (cmd_pa != rsp_pa) {
> priv->rsp = crb_map_res(dev, priv, &io_res, rsp_pa, rsp_size);
> - return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(priv->rsp);
> + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(priv->rsp);
> + goto out;
> }
>
> /* According to the PTP specification, overlapping command and response
> @@ -366,12 +383,18 @@ static int crb_map_io(struct acpi_device *device, struct crb_priv *priv,
> */
> if (cmd_size != rsp_size) {
> dev_err(dev, FW_BUG "overlapping command and response buffer sizes are not identical");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> }
> +
> priv->cmd_size = cmd_size;
>
> priv->rsp = priv->cmd;
> - return 0;
> +
> +out:
> + crb_go_idle(dev, priv);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> @@ -415,7 +438,15 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> - return crb_init(device, priv);
> + rc = crb_cmd_ready(dev, priv);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + rc = crb_init(device, priv);
> + if (rc)
> + crb_go_idle(dev, priv);
> +
> + return rc;
> }
>
> static int crb_acpi_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
> --
> 2.7.4
>