Re: [Nbd] [RESEND][PATCH 0/5] nbd improvements
From: Alex Bligh
Date: Thu Sep 15 2016 - 08:44:36 EST
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 13:41, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 01:39:11PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
>> That's probably right in the case of file-based back ends that
>> are running on a Linux OS. But gonbdserver for instance supports
>> (e.g.) Ceph based backends, where each connection might be talking
>> to a completely separate ceph node, and there may be no cache
>> consistency between connections.
>
> Yes, if you don't have a cache coherent backend you are generally
> screwed with a multiqueue protocol.
I wonder if the ability to support multiqueue should be visible
in the negotiation stage. That would allow the client to refuse
to select multiqueue where it isn't safe.
Wouter?
--
Alex Bligh