Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/dumpstack: replace dump_trace() with a new unwinder

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Sep 16 2016 - 05:16:32 EST



* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The last version was posted as part of a much larger patch set:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1471525031.git.jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> People complained about the set being too big, so it was split up into
> more digestible pieces. All the prerequisite patches for the unwinder
> have now been merged.
>
> See patch 1/6 for the background and justification for this change.
>
> Josh Poimboeuf (6):
> x86/unwind: add new unwind interface and implementations
> perf/x86: convert perf_callchain_kernel() to use the new unwinder
> x86/stacktrace: convert save_stack_trace_*() to use the new unwinder
> oprofile/x86: convert x86_backtrace() to use the new unwinder
> x86/dumpstack: convert show_trace_log_lvl() to use the new unwinder
> x86/dumpstack: remove dump_trace() and related callbacks
>
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 33 +++-----
> arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 46 +---------
> arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h | 74 ++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 6 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 174 +++++++++++++++++---------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 44 +---------
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 78 +----------------
> arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c | 74 +++++++---------
> arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/unwind_guess.c | 43 ++++++++++
> arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c | 39 ++++-----
> 11 files changed, 362 insertions(+), 342 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/unwind_guess.c

Looks good to me, but could you please rebase it on top of very latestest -tip,
which has these bits from Andy included:

1959a60182f4 x86/dumpstack: Pin the target stack when dumping it
cb76c9398240 x86/dumpstack: Add get_stack_info() interface

... which create new conflicts with your series.

Thanks,

Ingo