Re: [PATCH] realtek: Add switch variable to 'switch case not processed' messages
From: Jes Sorensen
Date: Sat Sep 24 2016 - 16:35:37 EST
Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 14:06 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>> On 09/24/2016 12:32 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> []
>> o Reindent all the switch/case blocks to a more normal
>> kernel style (git diff -w would show no changes here)
>> That sounds like busy work to me, but if you want to do it, go ahead.
>
> It's really just to make the comparison case block reductions
> easier to verify for later steps done
>
>> > o cast, spacing and parenthesis reductions
>> > Lots of odd and somewhat unique styles in various
>> > drivers, looks like too many individual authors without
>> > a style guide / code enforcer using slightly different
>> > personalized code. Glancing at the code, it looks to be
>> > similar logic, just written in different styles.
>> Same comment.
>
> Same rationale
>
>> > o Logic changes like
>> > from:
>> > if (foo) func(..., bar, ...); else func(..., baz, ...);
>> > to:
>> > func(..., foo ? bar : baz, ...);
>> > to make the case statement code blocks more consistent
>> > and emit somewhat smaller object code.
>> I find if .. else constructs much easier to read than the cond ? xxxx : yyyy
>> form. I would reject any such patches.
>
> <shrug> I think object code reduction generally a good thing
> but then again, I'm not a maintainer here.
I missed this part, but I am with Larry here - 'foo ? bar : boo' are
just obfuscating the code and far less clear than if or switch
statements.
Jes