Re: [PATCH RFC 1/5] x86,fpu: split prev/next task fpu state handling

[Rik van Riel]

On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 16:26 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2016 1:49 PM, <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Move all handling of the next state FPU state handling into
> > switch_fpu_finish, in preparation for more lazily switching
> > FPU states.
> > 
> > CR0.TS state is mirrored in a per-cpu variable, instead of
> > being passed around in a local variable, because that will
> > not be possible later in the series.
> 
> This seems reasonable in principle, but IMO it would be less scary if
> you rebased onto this:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/log/?h=x8
> 6/fpu

I can rebase on top of that.

I am perfectly fine with your patches going in
first, and mine later on. Too many FPU changes
at once is risky, anyway.

-- 
All Rights Reversed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part