Re: [PATCH 7/9] x86/fpu: rename lazy restore functions to "register state valid"

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 5:34 PM,  <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Name the functions after the state they track, rather than the function
> they currently enable. This should make it more obvious when we use the
> fpu_register_state_valid function for something else in the future.

I like this.

Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>