Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*()

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Wed Oct 05 2016 - 03:30:00 EST

Next message: Daniel Lezcano: "[PATCH 1/2] cpuidle: governors: Remove remaining old module code"
Previous message: Baolin Wang: "Re: [PATCH v16 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation"
In reply to: Davidlohr Bueso: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*()"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2016-10-03 11:12:37 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> These are unused and clutter up the code.

it seems that it has been like that since day one (Ingo's patches from
2006 [0] are like that). I assume we never had real code behind this
functions, right? Not even in -RT?

[0] http://people.redhat.com/mingo/PI-futex-patches/patches/

Sebastian

Next message: Daniel Lezcano: "[PATCH 1/2] cpuidle: governors: Remove remaining old module code"
Previous message: Baolin Wang: "Re: [PATCH v16 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation"
In reply to: Davidlohr Bueso: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/4] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*()"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]