Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] drivers: iio: ti_am335x_adc: add dma support

[Mugunthan V N]

On Wednesday 05 October 2016 12:01 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 10/05/16 09:21, Mugunthan V N wrote:
>> On Tuesday 04 October 2016 02:02 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> On 10/03/16 16:03, Mugunthan V N wrote:
>>>> +static int tiadc_request_dma(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>> +			     struct tiadc_device *adc_dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct tiadc_dma	*dma = &adc_dev->dma;
>>>> +	dma_cap_mask_t		mask;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* Default slave configuration parameters */
>>>> +	dma->conf.direction = DMA_DEV_TO_MEM;
>>>> +	dma->conf.src_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES;
>>>> +	dma->conf.src_addr = adc_dev->mfd_tscadc->tscadc_phys_base + REG_FIFO1;
>>>> +
>>>> +	dma_cap_zero(mask);
>>>> +	dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, mask);
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* Get a channel for RX */
>>>> +	dma->chan = dma_request_chan(adc_dev->mfd_tscadc->dev, "fifo1");
>>>> +	if (!dma->chan)
>>>> +		return -ENODEV;
>>>
>>> dma_request_chan() ERR_PTR in case of failure, never NULL. You should reuse
>>> the returned error code to support deferred probing.
>>
>> Will fix this in v3.
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* RX buffer */
>>>> +	dma->buf = dma_alloc_coherent(dma->chan->device->dev, DMA_BUFFER_SIZE,
>>>> +				      &dma->addr, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +	if (!dma->buf)
>>>> +		goto err;
>>>> +
>>>> +	return 0;
>>>> +err:
>>>> +	dma_release_channel(dma->chan);
>>>> +
>>>> +	return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  static int tiadc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>>  			  struct tiadc_device *adc_dev)
>>>>  {
>>>> @@ -512,8 +639,14 @@ static int tiadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>  
>>>>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);
>>>>  
>>>> +	err = tiadc_request_dma(pdev, adc_dev);
>>>> +	if (err && err != -ENODEV)
>>>> +		goto err_dma;
>>>
>>> You should handle the deferred probing for DMA channel.
>>
>> +	dma->chan = dma_request_chan(adc_dev->mfd_tscadc->dev, "fifo1");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(dma->chan)) {
>> +		int ret = PTR_ERR(dma->chan);
>> +
>> +		dma->chan = NULL;
>> +		return ret;
> 
> You don't need the 'ret' variable:
> 		return PTR_ERR(dma->chan);

So you mean change all *if (dma->chan)* to *if (IS_ERR(dma->chan))*?

> 
>> +	}
>>
>> With this probe defer will be taken care and ADC will continue without
>> DMA when request channel returns -ENODEV.
> 
> I would rather have explicit check for deferred probe:
> 
> err = tiadc_request_dma(pdev, adc_dev);
> if (err && err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> 	goto err_dma;

But in this case any other failure other than -EPROBE_DEFER will be
masked and ADC will be in PIO mode?

Regards
Mugunthan V N