Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/acpi: Prevent LAPIC id 0xff from being accounted

[Yinghai Lu]

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 6:28 AM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
<tipbot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Commit-ID:  8237bded3959c6d038798b905485d3ba94b8ea10
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/8237bded3959c6d038798b905485d3ba94b8ea10
> Author:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> AuthorDate: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 14:02:12 +0200
> Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CommitDate: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 15:22:15 +0200
>
> x86/acpi: Prevent LAPIC id 0xff from being accounted
>
> Yinghai reported that the recent changes to make the cpuid - nodeid
> relationship permanent causes a cpuid ordering regression on a system which
> has 2apic enabled..
>
> The reason is that the ACPI local APIC parser has no sanity check for
> apicid 0xff, which is an invalid id. So a CPU id for this invalid local
> APIC id is allocated and therefor breaks the cpuid ordering.
>
> Add a sanity check to acpi_parse_lapic() which ignores the invalid id.
>
> Fixes: 8f54969dc8d6 ("x86/acpi: Introduce persistent storage for cpuid <-> apicid mapping")
> Reported-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: douly.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> Cc: zhugh.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>,
> Cc: robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQVQx6FRXT-RdR7Crz4dg5LeUWHcUSy1KacjR+JgU_vGJg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> index 32a7d70..6d35baf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
> @@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ acpi_parse_lapic(struct acpi_subtable_header * header, const unsigned long end)
>
>         acpi_table_print_madt_entry(header);
>
> +       if (processor->id >= 0xff)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
>         /*
>          * We need to register disabled CPU as well to permit
>          * counting disabled CPUs. This allows us to size


some thing is wrong:

[   71.787437] ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0xff] lapic_id[0xff] disabled)
[   71.799681] ACPI: Error parsing LAPIC/X2APIC entries
[   71.809934] ACPI: Invalid BIOS MADT, disabling ACPI

looks like should change
   return -EINVAL ;
==>
   return 0;