Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] drivers: iio: ti_am335x_adc: add dma support

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sun Oct 09 2016 - 04:31:11 EST

Next message: Jia Hongtao: "[PATCH V2 5/5] arm64:dt:ls2080a: Add TMU device tree support for LS2080A"
Previous message: Aaron Lu: "Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 05/10/16 10:04, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> This patch adds the required pieces to ti_am335x_adc driver for
> DMA support
>
> Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@xxxxxx>
Hi,

Just the one question inline. I'll also need an Ack from Lee as
this touches code in mfd (as does the previous patch).
We have obviously missed this merge window, so no particular rush.

Otherwise, looking very nice indeed. Got to get my BBB out and play
with this now ;)

Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h | 7 ++
> 2 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> index c3cfacca..ad9dec3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti_am335x_adc.c
> @@ -30,10 +30,28 @@
> #include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
> #include <linux/iio/kfifo_buf.h>
>
> +#include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +
> +#define DMA_BUFFER_SIZE SZ_2K
> +
> +struct tiadc_dma {
> + struct dma_slave_config conf;
> + struct dma_chan *chan;
> + dma_addr_t addr;
> + dma_cookie_t cookie;
> + u8 *buf;
> + int current_period;
> + int period_size;
> + u8 fifo_thresh;
> +};
> +
> struct tiadc_device {
> struct ti_tscadc_dev *mfd_tscadc;
> + struct tiadc_dma dma;
> struct mutex fifo1_lock; /* to protect fifo access */
> int channels;
> + int total_ch_enabled;
> u8 channel_line[8];
> u8 channel_step[8];
> int buffer_en_ch_steps;
> @@ -198,6 +216,67 @@ static irqreturn_t tiadc_worker_h(int irq, void *private)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static void tiadc_dma_rx_complete(void *param)
> +{
> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = param;
> + struct tiadc_device *adc_dev = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + struct tiadc_dma *dma = &adc_dev->dma;
> + u8 *data;
> + int i;
> +
> + data = dma->buf + dma->current_period * dma->period_size;
> + dma->current_period = 1 - dma->current_period; /* swap the buffer ID */
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < dma->period_size; i += indio_dev->scan_bytes) {
> + iio_push_to_buffers(indio_dev, data);
> + data += indio_dev->scan_bytes;
> + }
Hmm. Another case for the mooted iio_push_to_buffers_multi. Guess
we should move on with that one ;)
> +}
> +
> +static int tiadc_start_dma(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +{
> + struct tiadc_device *adc_dev = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + struct tiadc_dma *dma = &adc_dev->dma;
> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc;
> +
> + dma->current_period = 0; /* We start to fill period 0 */
> + /*
> + * Make the fifo thresh as the multiple of total number of
> + * channels enabled, so make sure that cyclic DMA period
> + * length is also a multiple of total number of channels
> + * enabled. This ensures that no invalid data is reported
> + * to the stack via iio_push_to_buffers().
> + */
> + dma->fifo_thresh = rounddown(FIFO1_THRESHOLD + 1,
> + adc_dev->total_ch_enabled) - 1;
> + /* Make sure that period length is multiple of fifo thresh level */
> + dma->period_size = rounddown(DMA_BUFFER_SIZE / 2,
> + (dma->fifo_thresh + 1) * sizeof(u16));
> +
> + dma->conf.src_maxburst = dma->fifo_thresh + 1;
> + dmaengine_slave_config(dma->chan, &dma->conf);
> +
> + desc = dmaengine_prep_dma_cyclic(dma->chan, dma->addr,
> + dma->period_size * 2,
> + dma->period_size, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
> + DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT);
> + if (!desc)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + desc->callback = tiadc_dma_rx_complete;
> + desc->callback_param = indio_dev;
> +
> + dma->cookie = dmaengine_submit(desc);
> +
> + dma_async_issue_pending(dma->chan);
> +
> + tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_FIFO1THR, dma->fifo_thresh);
> + tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_DMA1REQ, dma->fifo_thresh);
> + tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_DMAENABLE_SET, DMA_FIFO1);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int tiadc_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> struct tiadc_device *adc_dev = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> @@ -218,20 +297,30 @@ static int tiadc_buffer_preenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> static int tiadc_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> struct tiadc_device *adc_dev = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + struct tiadc_dma *dma = &adc_dev->dma;
> + unsigned int irq_enable;
> unsigned int enb = 0;
> u8 bit;
>
> tiadc_step_config(indio_dev);
> - for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask, adc_dev->channels)
> + for_each_set_bit(bit, indio_dev->active_scan_mask, adc_dev->channels) {
> enb |= (get_adc_step_bit(adc_dev, bit) << 1);
> + adc_dev->total_ch_enabled++;
> + }
> adc_dev->buffer_en_ch_steps = enb;
>
> + if (dma->chan)
> + tiadc_start_dma(indio_dev);
> +
> am335x_tsc_se_set_cache(adc_dev->mfd_tscadc, enb);
>
> tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS, IRQENB_FIFO1THRES
> | IRQENB_FIFO1OVRRUN | IRQENB_FIFO1UNDRFLW);
> - tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_IRQENABLE, IRQENB_FIFO1THRES
> - | IRQENB_FIFO1OVRRUN);
> +
> + irq_enable = IRQENB_FIFO1OVRRUN;
> + if (!dma->chan)
> + irq_enable |= IRQENB_FIFO1THRES;
This changes the non dma behaviour as we no longer set IRQENB_FIFO1THRES.
Why? Was it wrong before?
> + tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_IRQENABLE, irq_enable);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -239,12 +328,18 @@ static int tiadc_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> static int tiadc_buffer_predisable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> {
> struct tiadc_device *adc_dev = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + struct tiadc_dma *dma = &adc_dev->dma;
> int fifo1count, i, read;
>
> tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_IRQCLR, (IRQENB_FIFO1THRES |
> IRQENB_FIFO1OVRRUN | IRQENB_FIFO1UNDRFLW));
> am335x_tsc_se_clr(adc_dev->mfd_tscadc, adc_dev->buffer_en_ch_steps);
> adc_dev->buffer_en_ch_steps = 0;
> + adc_dev->total_ch_enabled = 0;
> + if (dma->chan) {
> + tiadc_writel(adc_dev, REG_DMAENABLE_CLEAR, 0x2);
> + dmaengine_terminate_async(dma->chan);
> + }
>
> /* Flush FIFO of leftover data in the time it takes to disable adc */
> fifo1count = tiadc_readl(adc_dev, REG_FIFO1CNT);
> @@ -430,6 +525,41 @@ static const struct iio_info tiadc_info = {
> .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
> +static int tiadc_request_dma(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct tiadc_device *adc_dev)
> +{
> + struct tiadc_dma *dma = &adc_dev->dma;
> + dma_cap_mask_t mask;
> +
> + /* Default slave configuration parameters */
> + dma->conf.direction = DMA_DEV_TO_MEM;
> + dma->conf.src_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES;
> + dma->conf.src_addr = adc_dev->mfd_tscadc->tscadc_phys_base + REG_FIFO1;
> +
> + dma_cap_zero(mask);
> + dma_cap_set(DMA_CYCLIC, mask);
> +
> + /* Get a channel for RX */
> + dma->chan = dma_request_chan(adc_dev->mfd_tscadc->dev, "fifo1");
> + if (IS_ERR(dma->chan)) {
> + int ret = PTR_ERR(dma->chan);
> +
> + dma->chan = NULL;
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* RX buffer */
> + dma->buf = dma_alloc_coherent(dma->chan->device->dev, DMA_BUFFER_SIZE,
> + &dma->addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dma->buf)
> + goto err;
> +
> + return 0;
> +err:
> + dma_release_channel(dma->chan);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +}
> +
> static int tiadc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct tiadc_device *adc_dev)
> {
> @@ -512,8 +642,14 @@ static int tiadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);
>
> + err = tiadc_request_dma(pdev, adc_dev);
> + if (err && err == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + goto err_dma;
> +
> return 0;
>
> +err_dma:
> + iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> err_buffer_unregister:
> tiadc_iio_buffered_hardware_remove(indio_dev);
> err_free_channels:
> @@ -525,8 +661,14 @@ static int tiadc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct tiadc_device *adc_dev = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + struct tiadc_dma *dma = &adc_dev->dma;
> u32 step_en;
>
> + if (dma->chan) {
> + dma_free_coherent(dma->chan->device->dev, DMA_BUFFER_SIZE,
> + dma->buf, dma->addr);
> + dma_release_channel(dma->chan);
> + }
> iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> tiadc_iio_buffered_hardware_remove(indio_dev);
> tiadc_channels_remove(indio_dev);
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h b/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
> index e45a208..b9a53e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
> #define REG_IRQENABLE 0x02C
> #define REG_IRQCLR 0x030
> #define REG_IRQWAKEUP 0x034
> +#define REG_DMAENABLE_SET 0x038
> +#define REG_DMAENABLE_CLEAR 0x03c
> #define REG_CTRL 0x040
> #define REG_ADCFSM 0x044
> #define REG_CLKDIV 0x04C
> @@ -36,6 +38,7 @@
> #define REG_FIFO0THR 0xE8
> #define REG_FIFO1CNT 0xF0
> #define REG_FIFO1THR 0xF4
> +#define REG_DMA1REQ 0xF8
> #define REG_FIFO0 0x100
> #define REG_FIFO1 0x200
>
> @@ -126,6 +129,10 @@
> #define FIFOREAD_DATA_MASK (0xfff << 0)
> #define FIFOREAD_CHNLID_MASK (0xf << 16)
>
> +/* DMA ENABLE/CLEAR Register */
> +#define DMA_FIFO0 BIT(0)
> +#define DMA_FIFO1 BIT(1)
> +
> /* Sequencer Status */
> #define SEQ_STATUS BIT(5)
> #define CHARGE_STEP 0x11
>

Next message: Jia Hongtao: "[PATCH V2 5/5] arm64:dt:ls2080a: Add TMU device tree support for LS2080A"
Previous message: Aaron Lu: "Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sctp] a6c2f79287: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -37.2% regression"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]