Re: [PATCH v3 07/18] x86/intel_rdt: Add Haswell feature discovery

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Sun Oct 09 2016 - 07:41:32 EST


On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 07:45:52PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Some Haswell generation CPUs support RDT, but they don't enumerate this
> using CPUID. Use rdmsr_safe() and wrmsr_safe() to probe the MSRs on
> cpu model 63 (INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_X)
>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/cqm.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/intel_rdt_common.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/intel_rdt_common.h

...

> +static inline bool cache_alloc_hsw_probe(void)
> +{
> + u32 l, h_old, h_new, h_tmp;
> +
> + if (rdmsr_safe(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, &l, &h_old))
> + return false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Default value is always 0 if feature is present.
> + */
> + h_tmp = h_old ^ 0x1U;
> + if (wrmsr_safe(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, l, h_tmp))

I don't understand - you do the family/model check below and yet still
use the _safe() variants. Isn't the presence of that MSR guaranteed on
those machines?

> + return false;
> + rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, l, h_new);
> +
> + if (h_tmp != h_new)
> + return false;
> +
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, l, h_old);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
>
> static inline bool get_rdt_resources(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> {
> bool ret = false;
>
> + if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL && c->x86 == 6 &&
> + c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_X)
> + return cache_alloc_hsw_probe();
> +
> if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_RDT_A))
> return false;
> if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CAT_L3))
> --
> 2.5.0
>

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix ImendÃrffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG NÃrnberg)
--