Re: Btrfs: fix free space tree bitmaps on big-endian systems

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Mon Oct 24 2016 - 03:23:10 EST

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 2:46 AM, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Web: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/2fe1d55134fce05c17ea118a2e37a4af771887bc
> Commit: 2fe1d55134fce05c17ea118a2e37a4af771887bc

520f16abf003952d in v4.7.10
1ff6341b5d92dd6b in v4.8.4

> Parent: 08895a8b6b06ed2323cd97a36ee40a116b3db8ed
> Refname: refs/heads/master
> Author: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
> AuthorDate: Thu Sep 22 17:24:20 2016 -0700
> Committer: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
> CommitDate: Mon Oct 3 18:52:14 2016 +0200
>
> Btrfs: fix free space tree bitmaps on big-endian systems
>
> In convert_free_space_to_{bitmaps,extents}(), we buffer the free space
> bitmaps in memory and copy them directly to/from the extent buffers with
> {read,write}_extent_buffer(). The extent buffer bitmap helpers use byte
> granularity, which is equivalent to a little-endian bitmap. This means
> that on big-endian systems, the in-memory bitmaps will be written to
> disk byte-swapped. To fix this, use byte-granularity for the bitmaps in
> memory.

This change looks overly complex to me, and decreases performance.

>
> Fixes: a5ed91828518 ("Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.5+
> Tested-by: Holger HoffstÃtte <holger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++
> fs/btrfs/free-space-tree.c | 17 ++++++------
> 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> index 44fe66b..c3ec30d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
> @@ -5524,17 +5524,45 @@ void copy_extent_buffer(struct extent_buffer *dst, struct extent_buffer *src,
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * The extent buffer bitmap operations are done with byte granularity because
> - * bitmap items are not guaranteed to be aligned to a word and therefore a
> - * single word in a bitmap may straddle two pages in the extent buffer.
> - */
> -#define BIT_BYTE(nr) ((nr) / BITS_PER_BYTE)
> -#define BYTE_MASK ((1 << BITS_PER_BYTE) - 1)
> -#define BITMAP_FIRST_BYTE_MASK(start) \
> - ((BYTE_MASK << ((start) & (BITS_PER_BYTE - 1))) & BYTE_MASK)
> -#define BITMAP_LAST_BYTE_MASK(nbits) \
> - (BYTE_MASK >> (-(nbits) & (BITS_PER_BYTE - 1)))
> +void le_bitmap_set(u8 *map, unsigned int start, int len)
> +{
> + u8 *p = map + BIT_BYTE(start);

You cannot use cpu_to_le32/cpu_to_le64 on the masks and operate on
unsigned longs in memory because there's no alignment guarantee, right?

> + const unsigned int size = start + len;
> + int bits_to_set = BITS_PER_BYTE - (start % BITS_PER_BYTE);
> + u8 mask_to_set = BITMAP_FIRST_BYTE_MASK(start);
> +
> + while (len - bits_to_set >= 0) {
> + *p |= mask_to_set;
> + len -= bits_to_set;
> + bits_to_set = BITS_PER_BYTE;
> + mask_to_set = ~(u8)0;
> + p++;
> + }

memset() for all but the first partial byte (if present)?

> + if (len) {
> + mask_to_set &= BITMAP_LAST_BYTE_MASK(size);
> + *p |= mask_to_set;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void le_bitmap_clear(u8 *map, unsigned int start, int len)
> +{
> + u8 *p = map + BIT_BYTE(start);
> + const unsigned int size = start + len;
> + int bits_to_clear = BITS_PER_BYTE - (start % BITS_PER_BYTE);
> + u8 mask_to_clear = BITMAP_FIRST_BYTE_MASK(start);
> +
> + while (len - bits_to_clear >= 0) {
> + *p &= ~mask_to_clear;
> + len -= bits_to_clear;
> + bits_to_clear = BITS_PER_BYTE;
> + mask_to_clear = ~(u8)0;
> + p++;
> + }

memset() for all but the first partial byte (if present)?

> + if (len) {
> + mask_to_clear &= BITMAP_LAST_BYTE_MASK(size);
> + *p &= ~mask_to_clear;
> + }
> +}
>
> /*
> * eb_bitmap_offset() - calculate the page and offset of the byte containing the
> @@ -5578,7 +5606,7 @@ static inline void eb_bitmap_offset(struct extent_buffer *eb,
> int extent_buffer_test_bit(struct extent_buffer *eb, unsigned long start,
> unsigned long nr)
> {
> - char *kaddr;
> + u8 *kaddr;
> struct page *page;
> unsigned long i;
> size_t offset;
> @@ -5600,13 +5628,13 @@ int extent_buffer_test_bit(struct extent_buffer *eb, unsigned long start,
> void extent_buffer_bitmap_set(struct extent_buffer *eb, unsigned long start,
> unsigned long pos, unsigned long len)
> {
> - char *kaddr;
> + u8 *kaddr;
> struct page *page;
> unsigned long i;
> size_t offset;
> const unsigned int size = pos + len;
> int bits_to_set = BITS_PER_BYTE - (pos % BITS_PER_BYTE);
> - unsigned int mask_to_set = BITMAP_FIRST_BYTE_MASK(pos);
> + u8 mask_to_set = BITMAP_FIRST_BYTE_MASK(pos);
>
> eb_bitmap_offset(eb, start, pos, &i, &offset);
> page = eb->pages[i];
> @@ -5617,7 +5645,7 @@ void extent_buffer_bitmap_set(struct extent_buffer *eb, unsigned long start,
> kaddr[offset] |= mask_to_set;
> len -= bits_to_set;
> bits_to_set = BITS_PER_BYTE;
> - mask_to_set = ~0U;
> + mask_to_set = ~(u8)0;

Why?

> if (++offset >= PAGE_SIZE && len > 0) {
> offset = 0;
> page = eb->pages[++i];
> @@ -5642,13 +5670,13 @@ void extent_buffer_bitmap_set(struct extent_buffer *eb, unsigned long start,
> void extent_buffer_bitmap_clear(struct extent_buffer *eb, unsigned long start,
> unsigned long pos, unsigned long len)
> {
> - char *kaddr;
> + u8 *kaddr;
> struct page *page;
> unsigned long i;
> size_t offset;
> const unsigned int size = pos + len;
> int bits_to_clear = BITS_PER_BYTE - (pos % BITS_PER_BYTE);
> - unsigned int mask_to_clear = BITMAP_FIRST_BYTE_MASK(pos);
> + u8 mask_to_clear = BITMAP_FIRST_BYTE_MASK(pos);
>
> eb_bitmap_offset(eb, start, pos, &i, &offset);
> page = eb->pages[i];
> @@ -5659,7 +5687,7 @@ void extent_buffer_bitmap_clear(struct extent_buffer *eb, unsigned long start,
> kaddr[offset] &= ~mask_to_clear;
> len -= bits_to_clear;
> bits_to_clear = BITS_PER_BYTE;
> - mask_to_clear = ~0U;
> + mask_to_clear = ~(u8)0;

Why?

> if (++offset >= PAGE_SIZE && len > 0) {
> offset = 0;
> page = eb->pages[++i];

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds