Re: [PATCH] ARM: sti: stih410-clocks: Add PROC_STFE as a critical clock

From: Lee Jones
Date: Mon Oct 24 2016 - 04:50:42 EST


On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Peter Griffin wrote:

> Once the ST frontend demux HW IP has been enabled, the clock can't
> be disabled otherwise the system will hang and the board will
> be unserviceable.
>
> To allow balanced clock enable/disable calls in the driver we use
> the critical clock infrastructure to take an extra reference on the
> clock so the clock will never actually be disabled.

This is an abuse of the critical-clocks framework, and is exactly the
type of hack I promised the clk guys I'd try to prevent. If this, or
any other IP has some quirks (i.e. once enabled, if this clock is
subsequently disabled it will have a catastrophic effect on the
platform), then they should be worked around in the driver.

The correct thing to do here is craft a clk-keep-on flag and ensure it
is set to true for the effected platform(s)' platform data.

> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/stih410-clock.dtsi | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih410-clock.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih410-clock.dtsi
> index 8598eff..07c8ef9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih410-clock.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih410-clock.dtsi
> @@ -208,7 +208,8 @@
> "clk-clust-hades",
> "clk-hwpe-hades",
> "clk-fc-hades";
> - clock-critical = <CLK_ICN_CPU>,
> + clock-critical = <CLK_PROC_STFE>,
> + <CLK_ICN_CPU>,
> <CLK_TX_ICN_DMU>,
> <CLK_EXT2F_A9>,
> <CLK_ICN_LMI>,

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog