Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: smartpqi: Replace semaphore sync_request_sem with mutex

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday, October 24, 2016 3:34:27 PM CEST Binoy Jayan wrote:
> Hi Arnd
> 
> On 20 October 2016 at 14:36, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 20, 2016 2:24:01 PM CEST Binoy Jayan wrote:
> >> Semaphores are going away in the future, so replace the semaphore
> >> sync_request_sem with the a mutex lock. timeout_msecs is not used
> >> for the lock sync_request_sem, so remove the timed locking too.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The patch looks correct to me, but I think if you remove the support
> > for handling timeouts, you should update the prototype of
> > pqi_submit_raid_request_synchronous to no longer pass the timeout
> > argument in the first place.
> 
> But we still need "timeout_msecs" in a call to
> pqi_submit_raid_request_synchronous_with_io_request()
> 
> drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c +3484

Why? If it's always zero, we can remove that too.

	Arnd