Re: hit a KASan bug related to Perf during stress test

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:27:32PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:15:27PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > How about the trivial fix below?
> > 
> > Oleg.
> > 
> > --- x/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ x/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ static u32 perf_event_pid(struct perf_ev
> >  	if (event->parent)
> >  		event = event->parent;
> >  
> > -	return task_tgid_nr_ns(p, event->ns);
> > +	return pid_alive(p) ? task_tgid_nr_ns(p, event->ns) : 0;
> >  }
> 
> Also, now we get a (few) sample(s) with a different pid:tid than prior
> samples and not matching the sched_switch() events.
> 
> I can imagine that being somewhat confusing for people/tools.
> 
> Acme/Jolsa, any idea if that will bugger perf-report?

Hurm, then again, I imagine that after unhash_process the PID/TID could
be instantly re-used and then we're still confused.

Yuck.