Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm: make processing of movable_node arch-specific

[Reza Arbab]

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:34:18AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
> I still believe we need your changes, I was wondering if we've tested
> it against normal memory nodes and checked if any memblock
> allocations end up there. Michael showed me some memblock
> allocations on node 1 of a two node machine with movable_node

The movable_node option is x86-only. Both of those nodes contain normal 
memory, so allocations on both are allowed.

> > Longer; if you use "movable_node", x86 can identify these nodes at 
> > boot. They call memblock_mark_hotplug() while parsing the SRAT. Then, 
> > when the zones are initialized, those markings are used to determine 
> > ZONE_MOVABLE.
> >
> > We have no analog of this SRAT information, so our movable nodes can 
> > only be created post boot, by hotplugging and explicitly onlining 
> > with online_movable.
>
> Is this true for all of system memory as well or only for nodes
> hotplugged later?

As far as I know, power has nothing like the SRAT that tells us, at 
boot, which memory is hotpluggable. So there is nothing to wire the 
movable_node option up to.

Of course, any memory you hotplug afterwards is, by definition, 
hotpluggable. So we can still create movable nodes that way.

--
Reza Arbab