[PATCH 4.4 021/112] perf intel-pt: Fix MTC timestamp calculation for large MTC periods

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 3bccbe20f6d188ce7b00326e776b745cfd35b10a upstream.

The MTC packet provides a 8-bit slice of CTC which is related to TSC by
the TMA packet, however the TMA packet only provides the lower 16 bits
of CTC.  If mtc_shift > 8 then some of the MTC bits are not in the CTC
provided by the TMA packet. Fix-up the last_mtc calculated from the TMA
packet by copying the missing bits from the current MTC assuming the
least difference between the two, and that the current MTC comes after
last_mtc.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1475062896-22274-2-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c |   36 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt-decoder/intel-pt-decoder.c
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ struct intel_pt_decoder {
 	bool pge;
 	bool have_tma;
 	bool have_cyc;
+	bool fixup_last_mtc;
 	uint64_t pos;
 	uint64_t last_ip;
 	uint64_t ip;
@@ -584,10 +585,31 @@ struct intel_pt_calc_cyc_to_tsc_info {
 	uint64_t        tsc_timestamp;
 	uint64_t        timestamp;
 	bool            have_tma;
+	bool            fixup_last_mtc;
 	bool            from_mtc;
 	double          cbr_cyc_to_tsc;
 };
 
+/*
+ * MTC provides a 8-bit slice of CTC but the TMA packet only provides the lower
+ * 16 bits of CTC. If mtc_shift > 8 then some of the MTC bits are not in the CTC
+ * provided by the TMA packet. Fix-up the last_mtc calculated from the TMA
+ * packet by copying the missing bits from the current MTC assuming the least
+ * difference between the two, and that the current MTC comes after last_mtc.
+ */
+static void intel_pt_fixup_last_mtc(uint32_t mtc, int mtc_shift,
+				    uint32_t *last_mtc)
+{
+	uint32_t first_missing_bit = 1U << (16 - mtc_shift);
+	uint32_t mask = ~(first_missing_bit - 1);
+
+	*last_mtc |= mtc & mask;
+	if (*last_mtc >= mtc) {
+		*last_mtc -= first_missing_bit;
+		*last_mtc &= 0xff;
+	}
+}
+
 static int intel_pt_calc_cyc_cb(struct intel_pt_pkt_info *pkt_info)
 {
 	struct intel_pt_decoder *decoder = pkt_info->decoder;
@@ -617,6 +639,11 @@ static int intel_pt_calc_cyc_cb(struct i
 			return 0;
 
 		mtc = pkt_info->packet.payload;
+		if (decoder->mtc_shift > 8 && data->fixup_last_mtc) {
+			data->fixup_last_mtc = false;
+			intel_pt_fixup_last_mtc(mtc, decoder->mtc_shift,
+						&data->last_mtc);
+		}
 		if (mtc > data->last_mtc)
 			mtc_delta = mtc - data->last_mtc;
 		else
@@ -685,6 +712,7 @@ static int intel_pt_calc_cyc_cb(struct i
 
 		data->ctc_delta = 0;
 		data->have_tma = true;
+		data->fixup_last_mtc = true;
 
 		return 0;
 
@@ -751,6 +779,7 @@ static void intel_pt_calc_cyc_to_tsc(str
 		.tsc_timestamp  = decoder->tsc_timestamp,
 		.timestamp      = decoder->timestamp,
 		.have_tma       = decoder->have_tma,
+		.fixup_last_mtc = decoder->fixup_last_mtc,
 		.from_mtc       = from_mtc,
 		.cbr_cyc_to_tsc = 0,
 	};
@@ -1241,6 +1270,7 @@ static void intel_pt_calc_tma(struct int
 	}
 	decoder->ctc_delta = 0;
 	decoder->have_tma = true;
+	decoder->fixup_last_mtc = true;
 	intel_pt_log("CTC timestamp " x64_fmt " last MTC %#x  CTC rem %#x\n",
 		     decoder->ctc_timestamp, decoder->last_mtc, ctc_rem);
 }
@@ -1255,6 +1285,12 @@ static void intel_pt_calc_mtc_timestamp(
 
 	mtc = decoder->packet.payload;
 
+	if (decoder->mtc_shift > 8 && decoder->fixup_last_mtc) {
+		decoder->fixup_last_mtc = false;
+		intel_pt_fixup_last_mtc(mtc, decoder->mtc_shift,
+					&decoder->last_mtc);
+	}
+
 	if (mtc > decoder->last_mtc)
 		mtc_delta = mtc - decoder->last_mtc;
 	else