Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: introduce function max_bad_blocks
From: Boris Brezillon
Date: Thu Oct 27 2016 - 16:02:02 EST
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:14:00 -0500
Zach Brown <zach.brown@xxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Jeff Westfahl <jeff.westfahl@xxxxxx>
>
> If implemented, 'max_bad_blocks' returns the maximum number of bad
> blocks to reserve for an MTD. An implementation for NAND is coming soon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Westfahl <jeff.westfahl@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zach.brown@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> include/linux/mtd/mtd.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> index fccdd49..565f0dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> @@ -349,6 +349,16 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops part_ooblayout_ops = {
> .free = part_ooblayout_free,
> };
>
> +static int part_max_bad_blocks(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> +
> + if ((len + ofs) > mtd->size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return part->master->_max_bad_blocks(part->master,
> + ofs + part->offset, len);
> +}
> +
> static inline void free_partition(struct mtd_part *p)
> {
> kfree(p->mtd.name);
> @@ -481,6 +491,8 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partition(struct mtd_info *master,
> if (master->_put_device)
> slave->mtd._put_device = part_put_device;
>
> + if (master->_max_bad_blocks)
> + slave->mtd._max_bad_blocks = part_max_bad_blocks;
> slave->mtd._erase = part_erase;
> slave->master = master;
> slave->offset = part->offset;
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> index 13f8052..bd277eb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ struct mtd_info {
> int (*_block_isreserved) (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs);
> int (*_block_isbad) (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs);
> int (*_block_markbad) (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs);
> + int (*_max_bad_blocks) (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len);
Please provide an helper function around this hook, so that you can
call the helper in patch 3 and won't have to test the ->_max_bad_blocks
field directly.
This helper should return -ENOTSUPP if ->_max_bad_blocks is not
implemented.
> int (*_suspend) (struct mtd_info *mtd);
> void (*_resume) (struct mtd_info *mtd);
> void (*_reboot) (struct mtd_info *mtd);