[PATCH] [rfc, netfilter-next] netfilter: nf_tables: fib warnings

[Arnd Bergmann]

The newly added nft fib code produces two warnings:

net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv4.c: In function 'nft_fib4_eval':
net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv4.c:80:6: error: unused variable 'i' [-Werror=unused-variable]
net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv4.c: In function ânft_fib4_evalâ:
net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv4.c:137:6: error: âoifâ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

The first one is obvious as the only user of that variable is
inside of an #ifdef, but the second one is a bit trickier.
It is clear that 'oif' is uninitialized here if neither
NFTA_FIB_F_OIF nor NFTA_FIB_F_IIF are set.

I have no idea how that should be handled, this patch just
returns without doing anything, which may or may not be
the right thing to do.

Fixes: 84f5eedb983e ("netfilter: nf_tables: add fib expression")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv4.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv4.c
index 6787c563cfc9..b29f70593e8b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv4.c
@@ -77,7 +77,9 @@ void nft_fib4_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, struct nft_regs *regs,
 	};
 	const struct net_device *oif;
 	struct net_device *found;
+#ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH
 	int i;
+#endif
 
 	/*
 	 * Do not set flowi4_oif, it restricts results (for example, asking
@@ -90,6 +92,8 @@ void nft_fib4_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, struct nft_regs *regs,
 		oif = pkt->out;
 	else if (priv->flags & NFTA_FIB_F_IIF)
 		oif = pkt->in;
+	else
+		return;
 
 	if (pkt->hook == NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING && fib4_is_local(pkt->skb)) {
 		nft_fib_store_result(dest, priv->result, pkt, LOOPBACK_IFINDEX);
-- 
2.9.0