Hi Gabriel,Yes, no problem
On 10/14/2016 11:18 AM, gabriel.fernandez@xxxxxx wrote:
From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@xxxxxx>
v2:
- rename compatible property "st,stm32f46xx-rcc" into "st,stm32f469-rcc"
- cosmetic: remove bad copy/paste
This patch-set introduce RTC and QSPI clocks for STM32F4 socs
RTC clock has 3 parents clock oscillators (lsi/lse/hse_rtc)
example to use rtc clock:
rtc: rtc@40002800 {
compatible = "st,stm32-rtc";
reg = <0x40002800 0x400>;
...
clocks = <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;
assigned-clocks = <&rcc 1 CLK_RTC>;
assigned-clock-parents = <&rcc 1 CLK_LSE>;
...
};
Gabriel Fernandez (6):
clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks
ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks
arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON
clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock
clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock
ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock
You sent a V3 without DT patches. Should I take DT patches from this V2 patchset ?
Regards
Alex
.../devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32-rcc.txt | 4 +-
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f429.dtsi | 18 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f469-disco.dts | 4 +
arch/arm/configs/stm32_defconfig | 1 +
drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 442 ++++++++++++++++++++-
5 files changed, 447 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)