Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] clocksource: import ARC timer driver
From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Thu Nov 03 2016 - 19:02:06 EST
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:50:21PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 03:38 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:41PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >> This adds support for
> >> - CONFIG_ARC_TIMERS : legacy 32-bit TIMER0 and TIMER1 which count UP
> >> from @CNT to @LIMIT, before optionally triggering an interrupt.
> >> These are programmed using ARC auxiliary register interface.
> >> These are present in all ARC cores (ARC700 and ARC HS38)
> >> TIMER0 serves as clockevent for all ARC linux builds.
> >> TIMER1 is used for clocksource in arc700 builds.
> >> - CONFIG_ARC_TIMERS_64BIT: 64-bit counters, RTC and GFRC found in
> >> ARC HS38 cores. These are independnet IP blocks with different
> >> programming model respectively.
> >> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> > [ ... ]
> >> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> >> -#include <asm/irq.h>
> >> #include <soc/arc/timers.h>
> >> #include <soc/arc/mcip.h>
> >> @@ -263,7 +248,7 @@ static irqreturn_t timer_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >> * irq_set_chip_and_handler() asked for handle_percpu_devid_irq()
> >> */
> >> struct clock_event_device *evt = this_cpu_ptr(&arc_clockevent_device);
> >> - int irq_reenable = clockevent_state_periodic(evt);
> >> + int irq_reenable __maybe_unused = clockevent_state_periodic(evt);
> > Why is needed __maybe_unused ? I see in the previous driver 'irq_reenable' is
> > used or is there a change in the previous patches I missed ?
> This is needed when not building for CONFIG_ARC (saw this when building for ARM)
> write_aux_reg() becomes a no-op which causes a warning:
> write_aux_reg(ARC_REG_TIMER0_CTRL, irq_reenable | TIMER_CTRL_NH);
Instead of adding the __maybe_unused, changing in patch 7/10:
#define read_aux_reg(r) 0
#define write_aux_reg(r, v)
static inline int read_aux_reg(void *)
static inline void write_aux_reg(void *, u32)
Should fix the warning.