[PATCH 3.12 13/72] pstore/ram: Use memcpy_toio instead of memcpy

[Jiri Slaby]

From: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@xxxxxxxxxx>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 7e75678d23167c2527e655658a8ef36a36c8b4d9 upstream.

persistent_ram_update uses vmap / iomap based on whether the buffer is in
memory region or reserved region. However, both map it as non-cacheable
memory. For armv8 specifically, non-cacheable mapping requests use a
memory type that has to be accessed aligned to the request size. memcpy()
doesn't guarantee that.

Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Olof Johansson <olofj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
index ee3c6ec5348f..eb42483dbb05 100644
--- a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
+++ b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static void notrace persistent_ram_update(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz,
 	const void *s, unsigned int start, unsigned int count)
 {
 	struct persistent_ram_buffer *buffer = prz->buffer;
-	memcpy(buffer->data + start, s, count);
+	memcpy_toio(buffer->data + start, s, count);
 	persistent_ram_update_ecc(prz, start, count);
 }
 
-- 
2.10.2