Probably not. I've seen this register doesn't hold any previous settings (just trash)
On 11/08/2016 07:10 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
The dma ctlr is reseted to 0 while cpdma start, thus cpdma ctlr
I assume this is because cpdma_ctlr_start() does soft reset. Is it correct?
sure
cannot be configured after cpdma is stopped. So, restore content
of cpdma ctlr while off/on procedure.
Based on net-next/master
^ remove it
I'm ok if this is static (equally as a bunch of rest in dma_params), no see reason to use other values,
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 6 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.h | 2 +
3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index b1ddf89..4d04b8e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -1376,10 +1376,6 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
ALE_ALL_PORTS, ALE_ALL_PORTS, 0, 0);
if (!cpsw_common_res_usage_state(cpsw)) {
- /* setup tx dma to fixed prio and zero offset */
- cpdma_control_set(cpsw->dma, CPDMA_TX_PRIO_FIXED, 1);
- cpdma_control_set(cpsw->dma, CPDMA_RX_BUFFER_OFFSET, 0);
-
/* disable priority elevation */
__raw_writel(0, &cpsw->regs->ptype);
@@ -2710,6 +2706,8 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dma_params.desc_align = 16;
dma_params.has_ext_regs = true;
dma_params.desc_hw_addr = dma_params.desc_mem_phys;
+ dma_params.rxbuf_offset = 0;
+ dma_params.fixed_prio = 1;
Do we really need this new parameters? Do you have plans to use other values?