Re: [PATCH V3 9/9] PM / OPP: Don't assume platform doesn't have regulators

[Stephen Boyd]

On 10/26, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> If the regulators aren't set explicitly by the platform, the OPP core
> assumes that the platform doesn't have any regulator and uses the
> clk-only callback.
> 
> If the platform failed to register a regulator with the core, then this
> can turn out to be a dangerous assumption as the OPP core will try to
> change clk without changing regulators.
> 
> Handle that properly by making sure that the DT didn't had any entries

s/had/have/

> for supply voltages as well.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> index 3298fac01bb0..34cd48dfe89e 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c
> @@ -734,7 +734,17 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq)
>  
>  	/* Only frequency scaling */
>  	if (!regulators) {
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
> +		/*
> +		 * DT contained supply ratings? Consider platform failed to set
> +		 * regulators.
> +		 */
> +		if (unlikely(opp->supplies[0].u_volt)) {
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
> +			dev_err(dev, "%s: Regulator not registered with OPP core\n",
> +				__func__);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +

Don't we need an rcu_read_unlock() here as well?

>  		return _generic_set_opp_clk_only(dev, clk, old_freq, freq);
>  	}
>  

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project