Re: Proposal: HAVE_SEPARATE_IRQ_STACK?

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:17 AM, David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Easiest thing to do would be to select 16K page size in your .config, I
> think that will give you a similar sized stack.

I didn't realize that was possible...

I'm mostly concerned about the best way to deal with systems that have
a limited stack size on architectures without support for separate irq
stacks. Part of this I assume involves actually detecting with a
processor definition that the current architecture has a deceptively
small stack.