RE: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: hv: delete the device earlier from hbus->children for hot-remove

From: Jake Oshins
Date: Fri Nov 11 2016 - 19:44:18 EST


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dexuan Cui
> Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 11:20 PM
> To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthemmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jake Oshins <jakeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Hadden
> Hoppert <haddenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Vitaly Kuznetsov
> <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>; jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> olaf@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: hv: delete the device earlier from hbus->children
> for hot-remove
>
> After we send a PCI_EJECTION_COMPLETE message to the host, the host will
> immediately send us a PCI_BUS_RELATIONS message with
> relations->device_count == 0, so pci_devices_present_work(), running on
> another thread, can find the being-ejected device, mark
> the hpdev->reported_missing to true, and run list_move_tail()/list_del()
> for the device -- this races hv_eject_device_work() -> list_del().
>
> The patch moves the list_del() in hv_eject_device_work() to an earlier
> place, i.e. before we send PCI_EJECTION_COMPLETE, so later the
> pci_devices_present_work() can't see the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Jake Oshins <jakeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> index 7590ad0..fe5179d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -1582,6 +1582,10 @@ static void hv_eject_device_work(struct
> work_struct *work)
> pci_dev_put(pdev);
> }
>
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&hpdev->hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
> + list_del(&hpdev->list_entry);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpdev->hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
> +
> memset(&ctxt, 0, sizeof(ctxt));
> ejct_pkt = (struct pci_eject_response *)&ctxt.pkt.message;
> ejct_pkt->message_type.type = PCI_EJECTION_COMPLETE;
> @@ -1590,10 +1594,6 @@ static void hv_eject_device_work(struct
> work_struct *work)
> sizeof(*ejct_pkt), (unsigned long)&ctxt.pkt,
> VM_PKT_DATA_INBAND, 0);
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&hpdev->hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
> - list_del(&hpdev->list_entry);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hpdev->hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
> -
> put_pcichild(hpdev, hv_pcidev_ref_childlist);
> put_pcichild(hpdev, hv_pcidev_ref_pnp);
> put_hvpcibus(hpdev->hbus);
> --
> 2.7.4

This looks good, too.

-- Jake Oshins