Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: schedutil: enable fast switch earlier
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Sat Nov 12 2016 - 00:19:59 EST
On 12 November 2016 at 03:28, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> @@ -478,8 +484,6 @@ static void sugov_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>> struct sugov_tunables *tunables = sg_policy->tunables;
>> unsigned int count;
>>
>> - cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);
>> -
>
> ->but why is this change necessary?
>
> sugov_stop() has been called already, so the ordering here shouldn't matter.
Because sugov_policy_free() would be using the flag fast_switch_enabled.
--
viresh