[PATCH] [STYLE 1/2]staging:dgnc:dgnc_driver.h block comment modifications

[Walt Feasel]

Modified block comments for style consistency

Signed-off-by: Walt Feasel <waltfeasel@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
index 5becb37..03fc58e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_cts_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
 	/* Turn off auto Xon flow control */
 	efr &= ~UART_17158_EFR_IXON;
 
-	/* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+	/*
+	 * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
 	 * out before setting it
 	 */
 	writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -145,7 +146,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_rts_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
 	ier &= ~UART_17158_IER_XOFF;
 	efr &= ~UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF;
 
-	/* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+	/*
+	 * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
 	 * out before setting it
 	 */
 	writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -185,7 +187,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_ixon_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
 	/* Turn on auto Xon flow control */
 	efr |= (UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXON);
 
-	/* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+	/*
+	 * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
 	 * out before setting it
 	 */
 	writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -225,7 +228,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_ixoff_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
 	ier |= UART_17158_IER_XOFF;
 	efr |= (UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF);
 
-	/* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+	/*
+	 * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
 	 * out before setting it
 	 */
 	writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -268,7 +272,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_no_input_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
 	else
 		efr &= ~(UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF);
 
-	/* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero
+	/*
+	 * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero
 	 * it out before setting it
 	 */
 	writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -308,7 +313,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_no_output_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
 	else
 		efr &= ~(UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXON);
 
-	/* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+	/*
+	 * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
 	 * out before setting it
 	 */
 	writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -413,7 +419,8 @@ static inline void neo_parse_isr(struct dgnc_board *brd, uint port)
 			/* Read data from uart -> queue */
 			neo_copy_data_from_uart_to_queue(ch);
 
-			/* Call our tty layer to enforce queue
+			/*
+			 * Call our tty layer to enforce queue
 			 * flow control if needed.
 			 */
 			spin_lock_irqsave(&ch->ch_lock, flags);
@@ -438,7 +445,8 @@ static inline void neo_parse_isr(struct dgnc_board *brd, uint port)
 			 * one it was, so we can suspend or resume data flow.
 			 */
 			if (cause == UART_17158_XON_DETECT) {
-				/* Is output stopped right now, if so,
+				/*
+				 * Is output stopped right now, if so,
 				 * resume it
 				 */
 				if (brd->channels[port]->ch_flags & CH_STOP) {
-- 
2.1.4