Re: [PATCH 1/3] idle: add support for tasks that inject idle

From: Jacob Pan
Date: Mon Nov 14 2016 - 11:18:40 EST


On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:01:19 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:05:10AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > +void play_idle()
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * Only FIFO tasks can disable the tick since they don't
> > need the forced
> > + * preemption.
> > + */
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(current->policy != SCHED_FIFO);
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(current->nr_cpus_allowed != 1);
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD));
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_NO_SETAFFINITY));
> > + rcu_sleep_check();
> > +
> > + preempt_disable();
> > + current->flags |= PF_IDLE;
> > + do_idle();
> > + current->flags &= ~PF_IDLE;
> > +
> > + preempt_fold_need_resched();
> > + preempt_enable();
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(play_idle);
>
> Hurm.. didn't this initially also include the setup of the timer and
> take an timeout argument?

right, the initial version has a timeout and
init_timer_on_stack(timer);

I thought since this play_idle timer is likely to expire instead of
being canceled, so I switched to hrtimer by caller. We don't have an on
stack hrtimer, right? or Should we consider adding one?

Thanks,

Jacob