Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Add msm8974 clocks

From: Georgi Djakov
Date: Thu Nov 17 2016 - 11:59:28 EST


On 11/15/2016 08:54 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
This adds all RPM based clocks for msm8974 except cxo and gfx3d_clk_src.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt | 1 +
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++
include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h | 40 +++++++++++-
3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt
index 87d3714b956a..a7235e9e1c97 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.txt
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Required properties :
compatible "qcom,rpmcc" should be also included.

"qcom,rpmcc-msm8916", "qcom,rpmcc"
+ "qcom,rpmcc-msm8974", "qcom,rpmcc"
"qcom,rpmcc-apq8064", "qcom,rpmcc"

- #clock-cells : shall contain 1
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
index a27013dbc0aa..b8fcac6f2f87 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
@@ -462,8 +462,79 @@ static const struct rpm_smd_clk_desc rpm_clk_msm8916 = {
.num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(msm8916_clks),
};

+/* msm8974 */
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8974, pnoc_clk, pnoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8974, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8974, cnoc_clk, cnoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 2);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8974, mmssnoc_ahb_clk, mmssnoc_ahb_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 3);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8974, bimc_clk, bimc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MEM_CLK, 0);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8974, gfx3d_clk_src, gfx3d_a_clk_src, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MEM_CLK, 1);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8974, ocmemgx_clk, ocmemgx_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MEM_CLK, 2);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_QDSS(msm8974, qdss_clk, qdss_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_MISC_CLK, 1);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, cxo_d0, cxo_d0_a, 1);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, cxo_d1, cxo_d1_a, 2);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, cxo_a0, cxo_a0_a, 4);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, cxo_a1, cxo_a1_a, 5);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, cxo_a2, cxo_a2_a, 6);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, diff_clk, diff_a_clk, 7);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, div_clk1, div_a_clk1, 11);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(msm8974, div_clk2, div_a_clk2, 12);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_d0_pin, cxo_d0_a_pin, 1);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_d1_pin, cxo_d1_a_pin, 2);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_a0_pin, cxo_a0_a_pin, 4);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_a1_pin, cxo_a1_a_pin, 5);
+DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER_PINCTRL(msm8974, cxo_a2_pin, cxo_a2_a_pin, 6);
+
+static struct clk_smd_rpm *msm8974_clks[] = {
+ [RPM_SMD_PNOC_CLK] = &msm8974_pnoc_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_PNOC_A_CLK] = &msm8974_pnoc_a_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_SNOC_CLK] = &msm8974_snoc_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_SNOC_A_CLK] = &msm8974_snoc_a_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_CNOC_CLK] = &msm8974_cnoc_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_CNOC_A_CLK] = &msm8974_cnoc_a_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_MMSSNOC_AHB_CLK] = &msm8974_mmssnoc_ahb_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_MMSSNOC_AHB_A_CLK] = &msm8974_mmssnoc_ahb_a_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_BIMC_CLK] = &msm8974_bimc_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_BIMC_A_CLK] = &msm8974_bimc_a_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_OCMEMGX_CLK] = &msm8974_ocmemgx_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_OCMEMGX_A_CLK] = &msm8974_ocmemgx_a_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_QDSS_CLK] = &msm8974_qdss_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_QDSS_A_CLK] = &msm8974_qdss_a_clk,
+ [RPM_SMD_CXO_D0] = &msm8974_cxo_d0,
+ [RPM_SMD_CXO_D0_A] = &msm8974_cxo_d0_a,
+ [RPM_SMD_CXO_D1] = &msm8974_cxo_d1,
+ [RPM_SMD_CXO_D1_A] = &msm8974_cxo_d1_a,
+ [RPM_SMD_CXO_A0] = &msm8974_cxo_a0,
+ [RPM_SMD_CXO_A0_A] = &msm8974_cxo_a0_a,
+ [RPM_SMD_CXO_A1] = &msm8974_cxo_a1,
+ [RPM_SMD_CXO_A1_A] = &msm8974_cxo_a1_a,
+ [RPM_SMD_CXO_A2] = &msm8974_cxo_a2,

There are some extra tabs above. Otherwise looks fine:
Tested-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@xxxxxxxxxx>

BR,
Georgi